AddThis Sharing ButtonsShare to LinkedInLinkedInLinkedInShare to TwitterTwitterTwitterShare to FacebookFacebookFacebookShare to MoreAddThisMore 14 DEC 2012 Related The top two French operators France Telecom-Orange and SFR have been fined a total of EUR183.1 million by the country’s regulator for anti-competitive practices.The fine has been levied due to the companies offering unlimited calls between subscribers on the same operator, which the competition authority said distorted competition and harmed number-three operator Bouygues Telecom.France Telecom-Orange was fined EUR117.4 million with Vivendi-owned SFR hit to the tune of EUR65.7 million. France Telecom earned a higher penalty as it was the sixth anti-competitive incident the group has been involved with in the past 15 years.The regulator found that with 17 percent of the market, Bouygues was unable to match the offers as its in-network calls were less frequent for customers. When the company responded with similar offers, it hurt its profitabilityBoth France Telecom and SFR said they plan to appeal the fines.The decision was the result of a complaint filed by Bouygues in October 2006 and relates to the period between 2005 and 2008. Altice strikes deal to buy French MVNO business Author Previous ArticleClearwire cool on Sprint bid; Softbank caps offer – reportNext ArticleNew study finds emergency response is hampered by lack of collaboration BouyguesFrance TelecomSFR Home Orange, SFR hit by anti-competitive fines Tim joined Mobile World Live in August 2011 and works across all channels, with a particular focus on apps. He came to the GSMA with five years of tech journalism experience, having started his career as a reporter… More Read more SFR to cut staff as part of digital push Tags Tim Ferguson Free Mobile keeps battling handset subsidies
iStock(EL PASO, Texas) — A Texas couple injured in the mass shooting last month at an El Paso Walmart has sued the superstore on grounds it failed to provide adequate security to prevent the attack.El Paso residents Guillermo and Jessica Garcia were shopping with their two children on Aug. 3 when they were shot and “gravely injured,” according to the lawsuit, filed in El Paso district court on Friday. The lawsuit argues that the company should have had security at the store entrance and around common areas.“If Walmart had taken its responsibilities to its customers seriously, it would have had a visible security presence that would have stopped the shooter from coming to Walmart and killing all those people,” the couple’s attorney, Patrick Luff, told ABC News.Since the shooting, Walmart — among the country’s principal sellers of firearms and ammunition — has come under increased pressure to change its policy on gun sales. On Tuesday, Walmart CEO Doug McMillon wrote in a memo to employees that it will no longer tell certain types of rifle ammunition, and will “sell through” and discontinue handgun ammunition. In addition, the company has called for a renewed debate over the assault-weapons ban.In response to the lawsuit, Walmart spokesman Randy Hargraves said in a statement to ABC News: “This tragic event will be with us forever and our hearts go out to the families that were impacted. Safety is a top priority and we care deeply about our associates and customers. We preserved what information we have, and we’ve worked meticulously with federal and local authorities as they documented everything that took place on August 3. Once we are served with the complaint, we will respond appropriately with the Court.”The shooting began on a Saturday morning when the store was crowded with back-to-store shoppers. The fact that it was “particularly crowded” on the day of the shooting exacerbated the need for security, according to the lawsuit.Jessica Garcia’s father, Don Coca, told the El Paso Times that he believes that had Walmart provided armed security on the premises, things “would have turned out different.”Guillermo Garcia is still in critical condition after he was shot in the spine and required multiple surgeries, according to the Times. He will “probably never walk again,” Coca said.The court documents do not include a request for monetary damages, but seek details on the company’s “active shooter” training program and whether any changes were made after a shooting occurred at a Walmart in Amarillo, Texas, on June 14, 2016.The lawsuit also requests a restraining order to prevent Walmart from changing or altering the scene or destroying or altering any evidence. Walmart announced last month that it will reopen the store after the interior is rebuilt.Copyright © 2019, ABC Radio. All rights reserved.